Delenn wrote:
In the specific case of You're the Worst. The 'proof' (that would meet current TvM data policy) is the fact that onscreen credits from the original airing do not refer to anything being part 1 or part 2. There is one credit block, at the beginning, one writer credit, one director credit. By comparison, The Good Place onscreen credits from the original airing specifically refer to 'Chapter X' by written by Writer A and 'Chapter Y' being written by Writer B. The onscreen credits are the 'proof', and therefore it's listed as 2 episodes.Your Cannon example presumably wouldn't pass TvM quality control, it's not the original airing, it's a repeat years later. That's not 'proof' if it's not the original airing. The original source should be gospel as per your words a few posts up. In all cases the original airings are the gospel, yes?
Also, you were the one who brought up 'proof', why ask how we would prove something only to say 'demanding proof' is unnecessary due to the trust system? I'm genuinely confused.
In the specific case of You're the Worst, what screencap would I make that would show there's only one credit block?
For Cannon, how would TVM quality control determine that it's not the original airing? And no, according to some people, the original airings aren't the gospel. Like the statement "Well that proof isn't good for me."
Why do I ask? Because in some instances such as Monk and Cannon, presumably I'd have to "prove" that they should be listed the way they are per the original suggestion ("stick to the goddamn wiki").. So I'm curious to know what proof would be acceptable. So far, it seems to be a matter of trust, which I'm fine with. ( I can't speak to shows I haven't watched.) But if trust was acceptable... this thread wouldn't exist. :)