@ras44ecs wrote:
Besides killing (boring waste of) time with elongated scenes that don't advance the story, how many incongruities can one show have? I was going to start listing some and realized, way too many. 34:03 into episode 2... I'm out. 

btw, I liked other Vince Gilligan shows like Better Call Saul and Battle Creek. I think this is similar to the decline of David E. Kelley projects.

Just 1 more thing as Columbo would say. I only lasted the same length of time on Breaking Bad (3 tries though) and that is supposed to be the best show of all time so, shows what I know. 6 7

Okay so, I had to try and finish this episode before I deleted it and, well, the lunch scene got me. I have the next episode downloaded already so I guess I'll give it another go. Fingers crossed. But you all knew all that already, right?

@DPh2902 wrote:
Sorry this is an absolutely horrible show, couldn't even make it through this 2nd episode. 

Besides killing (boring waste of) time with elongated scenes that don't advance the story, how many incongruities can one show have? I was going to start listing some and realized, way too many. 34:03 into episode 2... I'm out. 

btw, I liked other Vince Gilligan shows like Better Call Saul and Battle Creek. I think this is similar to the decline of David E. Kelley projects.

Just 1 more thing as Columbo would say. I only lasted the same length of time on Breaking Bad (3 tries though) and that is supposed to be the best show of all time so, shows what I know. 6 7

We're out. The never-ending back and forth is like bad Mamet dialog. It reminds me of the old video game Pong. It doesn't age well.

I can't. I expected more from a Chuck Lorre product. This is a bad case of regression. Sign of the times I guess. Prices are up, quality is down. Standards no longer exist. My oh my.