You have to correct the title "SeaQuest DSV". The logo is just stylized, as "Wikipedia" clarifies, from a graphic designer. Nothing more, nothing less.
@Mandrake wrote:
You have to correct the title "SeaQuest DSV". The logo is just stylized, as "Wikipedia" clarifies, from a graphic designer. Nothing more, nothing less.
Wikipedia isnt an official source. What we have is fine as per the sites data policies.
This episodes did not air due to world events taking precedent. It will probably air later but should have the airdate removed.
@pietrpahn wrote:
This episodes did not air due to world events taking precedent. It will probably air later but should have the airdate removed.
done :)
@Jan wrote:
Edit Requests can be posted here.
Note: the old thread was closed down due to its size.
Vindication is still running & recently dropped a third seaso. I don’t know know where all it is available, but I am watching it via Great American PureFlix.
https://www.tvmaze.com/shows/48114/vindication
@BamaGirl wrote:
Vindication is still running & recently dropped a third seaso. I don’t know know where all it is available, but I am watching it via Great American PureFlix.https://www.tvmaze.com/shows/48114/vindication
Did you change the network before or after knowing if GAC Family are airing it as well aa making it?
Two requests regarding The Drew Barrymore Show:
1. Could this image be deleted? I've just uploaded a better/larger version of it.
2. Could this image be changed to be the main image for the show? It is the poster for the new season and is the 'better/larger' version of the poster I mentioned above.
Thanks in advance.
@Magitroopa wrote:
Two requests regarding The Drew Barrymore Show:1. Could this image be deleted? I've just uploaded a better/larger version of it.
2. Could this image be changed to be the main image for the show? It is the poster for the new season and is the 'better/larger' version of the poster I mentioned above.
Thanks in advance.
all set :)
@TomSouthwell wrote:
Wikipedia isnt an official source. What we have is fine as per the sites data policies.
As usually, TomSouthwell didn't even try to open the link I provided. If he did, he would see that "unnoficial Wikipedia" has the same title as you, here. I was just stated the obvious where they also testify, that you don't need an "official source" to understand (unless someone has perception issues) that this logo is just stylized by a graphic designer but it's still the name of the submarine and by that, the title of the show is given. Do you know many names of cars, boats, airplanes, submarines, helicopters or even spaceships out there that doesn't have first letter in uppercase? Besides that, you're not official page of shows too. You know that, right? Can you provide us a proof, besides that stylized logo, that is written this way by the network?
@Mandrake wrote:
As usually, TomSouthwell didn't even try to open the link I provided. If he did, he would see that "unnoficial Wikipedia" has the same title as you, here. I was just stated the obvious where they also testify, that you don't need an "official source" to understand (unless someone has perception issues) that this logo is just stylized by a graphic designer but it's still the name of the submarine and by that, the title of the show is given. Do you know many names of cars, boats, airplanes, submarines, helicopters or even spaceships out there that doesn't have first letter in uppercase? Besides that, you're not official page of shows too. You know that, right? Can you provide us a proof, besides that stylized logo, that is written this way by the network?
Yes i did open the link. Please take the tone and attitude out of your response if you would like a civil reply. If not you won't be getting one moving forwards.
@TomSouthwell wrote:
Yes i did open the link. Please take the tone and attitude out of your response if you would like a civil reply. If not you won't be getting one moving forwards.
No you didn't, because you use the argument of "official source" when they have the same title with you already. If you have seen it, you shouldn't invoke that argument. So if they are not correct on their title because they are not an official source and you disagree with them, neither you are. Am I right? Let's say I'm uncivilized and that "attitude" of mine doesn't come out of frustration attempting to solve the most simple and self-explanatory issues. Shame on me. On the other hand, those who want to be called civilized do not answer piecemeal but to everything that have been asked from them, to end this discussion civilly. They don't back down when an argument is made. So where is the evidence of an official source that shows as original title the one you already have and not that I propose? Or where is another example of a name that the 1st letter is not an uppercase. In thousands of productions of US/UK origin (English language) you already have here, do you have such an example? If you provide proof to this community, I will apologize for "my attitude".
@Mandrake wrote:
No you didn't, because you use the argument of "official source" when they have the same title with you already. If you have seen it, you shouldn't invoke that argument. So if they are not correct on their title because they are not an official source, neither you are. Am I right? Let's say I'm uncivilized and that "attitude" of mine doesn't come out of frustration attempting to solve the most simple and self-explanatory issues. Shame on me. On the other hand, those who want to be called civilized, do not answer piecemeal but to everything that was asked of them, to end this discussion civilly. They don't back down when an argument is made. So where is the evidence of an official source that shows as original title the one you already have and not that I propose? If you show that to this community, I will apologize for "my attitude".
Hi Mandrake. The way we see it It's the other way around. You're the one that want something changed, so you'll have to convince us and come up with a official source proving what we have listed is wrong. :)
@Aidan wrote:
Hi Mandrake. The way we see it It's the other way around. You're the one that want something changed, so you'll have to convince us and come up with a official source proving what we have listed is wrong. :)
Where did you find my friend that title in the first place? In "The TVDB" that you get the API of all productions, right? :) Is this an official source? Therefore, you copied a title from an unofficial source and when a member makes a request to correct the obvious, you tell him to look for an official source when you already know there isn't one, as usually happens in thousands of older shows. Isn't that hypocritical? :)
@Mandrake wrote:
Where did you find my friend that title in the first place? In "The TVDB" that you get the API of all productions, right? :) Is this an official source? Therefore, you copied a title from an unofficial source and when a member makes a request to correct the obvious, you tell him to look for an official source when you already know there isn't one, as usually happens in thousands of older shows. Isn't that hypocritical? :)
Since you don't have any new information we will be sticking with the name we already have :)
Please change the title of The Therapy to Sebastian Fitzeks Die Therapie.
@Mandrake wrote:
No you didn't, because you use the argument of "official source" when they have the same title with you already. If you have seen it, you shouldn't invoke that argument. So if they are not correct on their title because they are not an official source and you disagree with them, neither you are. Am I right? Let's say I'm uncivilized and that "attitude" of mine doesn't come out of frustration attempting to solve the most simple and self-explanatory issues. Shame on me. On the other hand, those who want to be called civilized do not answer piecemeal but to everything that have been asked from them, to end this discussion civilly. They don't back down when an argument is made. So where is the evidence of an official source that shows as original title the one you already have and not that I propose? Or where is another example of a name that the 1st letter is not an uppercase. In thousands of productions of US/UK origin (English language) you already have here, do you have such an example? If you provide proof to this community, I will apologize for "my attitude".
Where did you find my friend that title in the first place? In "The TVDB" that you get the API of all productions, right? :) Is this an official source? Therefore, you copied a title from an unofficial source and when a member makes a request to correct the obvious, you tell him to look for an official source when you already know there isn't one, as usually happens in thousands of older shows. Isn't that hypocritical? :)
"seaQuest DSV" is correct and can be confirmed by the production company Amblin - an official source - which I found with a quick google search. I also found TV guides and press releases (both official sources) which confirm the name, that you could've found yourself before asking to change the name :)
Show titles don't have to follow English grammar rules, another show that starts with a lower case letter is grown-ish.
@Calamaz wrote:
Please change the title of The Therapy to Sebastian Fitzeks Die Therapie.
changed :)
@CosmicHowl wrote:
"seaQuest DSV" is correct and can be confirmed by the production company Amblin - an official source - which I found with a quick google search. I also found TV guides and press releases (both official sources) which confirm the name, that you could've found yourself before asking to change the name :)
Show titles don't have to follow English grammar rules, another show that starts with a lower case letter is grown-ish.
twentysomething, thirtysomething