Please delete http://www.tvmaze.com/episodes/135054/riptide-3x15-smiles-we-left-behind-2 it's a single episode
Please delete http://www.tvmaze.com/episodes/135054/riptide-3x15-smiles-we-left-behind-2 it's a single episode
Aidan wrote:
Please delete http://www.tvmaze.com/episodes/135054/riptide-3x15-smiles-we-left-behind-2 it's a single episode
Done :)
Is it possible to batch-delete all episode summaries for a show?
It's an identical, generic description ("Renee Young catches up with your favorite SmackDown LIVE Superstars after the show to hear their thoughts on all of the evening's action."), and submitted to almost all episodes.
(And perhaps ask the submitter, JAGUARDOG, not to do that?)
http://www.tvmaze.com/shows/19667/wwe-talking-smack
Edit: never mind, I edited them manually. But since JD has done this with shows before, please talk with him.
momijigari wrote:
Is it possible to batch-delete all episode summaries for a show?It's an identical, generic description ("Renee Young catches up with your favorite SmackDown LIVE Superstars after the show to hear their thoughts on all of the evening's action."), and submitted to almost all episodes.
(And perhaps ask the submitter, JAGUARDOG, not to do that?)
http://www.tvmaze.com/shows/19667/wwe-talking-smack
Edit: never mind, I edited them manually. But since JD has done this with shows before, please talk with him.
I will message him :)
JuanArango wrote:
Thank you, removed :)
Thank you
momijigari wrote:
Is it possible to batch-delete all episode summaries for a show?It's an identical, generic description ("Renee Young catches up with your favorite SmackDown LIVE Superstars after the show to hear their thoughts on all of the evening's action."), and submitted to almost all episodes.
(And perhaps ask the submitter, JAGUARDOG, not to do that?)
http://www.tvmaze.com/shows/19667/wwe-talking-smack
Edit: never mind, I edited them manually. But since JD has done this with shows before, please talk with him.
I am the one who submitted it. That's ridiculous, the reason it has the same summary is because that's what it is or was each week, you even edited the specials for the pay per view episodes, that's nuts and totally disrespectful. So i guess you have a problem with WWE official synopsis too.
Whitey01 wrote:
I am the one who submitted it. That's ridiculous, the reason it has the same summary is because that's what it is or was each week, you even edited the specials for the pay per view episodes, that's nuts and totally disrespectful. So i guess you have a problem with WWE official synopsis too.
No, but it makes no sense to fill in the same generic summary for 100 episodes, If it is a generic description of the show , it should be used as the show summary.
JuanArango wrote:
No, but it makes no sense to fill in the same generic summary for 100 episodes, If it is a generic description of the show , it should be used as the show summary.
There's only so many ways you can say that they'll interview tonight's contestants, tho. Changing it just for the sake of changing it doesn't make much sense either, especially when the official descriptions don't change.
JuanArango wrote:
No, but it makes no sense to fill in the same generic summary for 100 episodes, If it is a generic description of the show , it should be used as the show summary.
It is used as the show summary, he didn't even know about it until i posted to have the non existent future shows removed, anyway your the boss so fine, i've re-posted the synopsis for the pay per view shows as they are specific.
Whitey01 wrote:
It is used as the show summary, he didn't even know about it until i posted to have the non existent future shows removed, anyway your the boss so fine, i've re-posted the synopsis for the pay per view shows as they are specific.
Yes, that is fine, please do not be angry, everyone makes mistakes :)
Hello, could someone please delete the entry of Zach McGowan from the cast of Damnation? I forgot recurring roles should not be added as cast member... Thanks and sorry for the mistake! :)
http://www.tvmaze.com/shows/30605/kexp doesn't fit our requirements. The episodes hardly have above 12K views, and average views are <1K. Am I missing something?
tnt wrote:
http://www.tvmaze.com/shows/30605/kexp doesn't fit our requirements. The episodes hardly have above 12K views, and average views are <1K. Am I missing something?
This is a worlwide well known show, where many well known indie bands perform :)
NathanDrake83 wrote:
Hello, could someone please delete the entry of Zach McGowan from the cast of Damnation? I forgot recurring roles should not be added as cast member... Thanks and sorry for the mistake! :)
done :)
JuanArango wrote:
This is a worlwide well known show, where many well known indie bands perform :)
Ok, you could tell from the number of views :)
So what, rules doesn't apply to it? Or it have a big budget?
tnt wrote:
Ok, you could tell from the number of views :)
So what, rules doesn't apply to it? Or it have a big budget?I am watching the show regularly and know many music enthusiasts who do the same.
I have to admit I neither researched the budget and also did not look at the numbers, as I watch the show for a long time and didnot think that this wouzld not match our criteria.
JuanArango wrote:
I am watching the show regularly and know many music enthusiasts who do the same.I have to admit I neither researched the budget and also did not look at the numbers, as I watch the show for a long time and didnot think that this wouzld not match our criteria.
Hmm. Other series that we are rejecting because they don't fit the policy requirements are also watched by the people who requested them. I have nothing against this particular series (except that it doesn't have required views number), just curious why it should be an exception, that's all.
tnt wrote:
Hmm. Other series that we are rejecting because they don't fit the policy requirements are also watched by the people who requested them. I have nothing against this particular series (except that it doesn't have required views number), just curious why it should be an exception, that's all.
It should not, I just neber thought it would not meet them, I will try to find out thje budget and when its under the requirements I will delete it :)
JuanArango wrote:
It should not, I just neber thought it would not meet them, I will try to find out thje budget and when its under the requirements I will delete it :)
Sorry to rain on your parade :)
Here is some info about KEXP, they are an institution for 40 years and a Non Profit Organization:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KEXP-FM
https://de-de.facebook.com/kexp.fm/
This is not some russian blog channel :)
I really would like to keep this.
cheers
Juan