When you try to order by some criteria (i.e. "Premiered Least Recently"), the TV shows are not listed properly.
This is mainly for those shows that are marked as "In Development".
All the rest seem to be ordered correctly, but those in development don't really have any info of airing or premiering last/first, etc. and should probably appear at the end. However, they do not. Instead, they randomly appear mixed in the list at random places.
@david wrote:
Should be fixed :)
Nope.
When I list my followed shows by "Premiered Most Recently" I see something like this (small excerpt)...
Ended
Ended
Ended
Ended
In Development
In Development
In Development
In Development
In Development
In Development
In Development
In Development
In Development
In Development
In Development
In Development
Ended
Ended
:-| If I follow a few of the shows you listed and sort by "Premiered Most Recently", the order is:
The Persuaders Feb 25, 1972 Ended
Dan August Apr 8, 1971 Ended
The Last of Us In Development
Star Trek: Section 31 In Development
Frasier In Development
E.g., the two in-development shows without a premiere date properly together at the end.
@david wrote:
:-| If I follow a few of the shows you listed and sort by "Premiered Most Recently", the order is:The Persuaders Feb 25, 1972 Ended
Dan August Apr 8, 1971 Ended
The Last of Us In Development
Star Trek: Section 31 In Development
Frasier In DevelopmentE.g., the two in-development shows without a premiere date properly together at the end.
It was by "Premiered Least Recently", sorry. But by Most Recently it's also strange.
For example, when I sort by "Premiered Most Recently", it's like this...
The Book of Bobba Fett - In Development
Hawkeye - Running
...
(after some 250 listed shows)
...
Dan August - Ended
(many shows that are in development) - In Development
Scooby Doo - Ended
...
The biggest mystery is between "Dan August" and "Scooby Doo". Both these shows have all dates for all episodes and have ended.
Why are all of those shows in development listed in between those two shows?
Bobba Fett is on top because it has date for premiered show, the others in dev. shows don't, but that still doesn't answer why they are all listed between Scooby Doo and Dan August instead of, say, at the end of the list.
Right, there was still a bug concerning shows that premiered very long ago. Can you check again?
Still wrong for me
@david wrote:
Right, there was still a bug concerning shows that premiered very long ago. Can you check again?
Filters seem fixed now. Thanks :)
Not fixed on my side.
Here's what I get : https://www.awesomescreenshot.com/image/17436359?key=4a5342f77a3b0413e15931e2b442c71d
That doesn't look like the issue MAT13 reported. Shows that are still in development obviously don't have an airdate yet, so if you sort them by "aired most recently" they have to be placed somewhere...
Yes, but the thing is, they were at the bottom of the list until recently. The change concern also 'Premeried most recently', same issue : https://www.awesomescreenshot.com/image/17514423?key=265d0a2a10077c49287f300c95414fe5
Considering the fact there was no problem until few days ago, it means something changed in the code
@MAT13 wrote:
When you try to order by some criteria (i.e. "Premiered Least Recently"), the TV shows are not listed properly.This is mainly for those shows that are marked as "In Development".
All the rest seem to be ordered correctly, but those in development don't really have any info of airing or premiering last/first, etc. and should probably appear at the end. However, they do not. Instead, they randomly appear mixed in the list at random places.S
Same here... in development shows first at show status
Right. It was always undefined whether episodes without airdate would be on the bottom or top of that list, but if you all think it makes more sense for them to be on the bottom I'll make it so :)
Thanks !
It almost back to normal.
If I sort by 'Premiered Most recently', I get this : https://www.awesomescreenshot.com/image/17654361?key=a54aa295249389a3fe057573b3833bc6 . And it weird to see future shows at the top of the list since they haven't premiered yet.
Ha, I think that's to be expected: "premiered most recently" simply means to sort by premiere date, which can of course be in the future.
Indeed, but considering the label it isn't correct.
And it wasn't the case until recently. I don't understand why it has been changed. On the coding side of things, it's not complicated.
@Cecile wrote:
And it wasn't the case until recently.
gremlins
@blackcat2021 wrote:
gremlins
I don't understand, probably don't have the reference
