@Nikquest wrote:
As for parentheses - maybe. Here is at your discretion. But to separate episodes coming out in a row and having the same name into parts is the norm for the site, isn’t it? At the very least, I very often saw these Part 1, Part 2 ...
In any case, the full names of the three episodes I have provided you. Act in accordance with your policy or as you want. I will not change anything.
The Policy says that on-screen tops everything, so we should act accordingly to this :)
@Nikquest wrote:
As for parentheses - maybe. Here is at your discretion. But to separate episodes coming out in a row and having the same name into parts is the norm for the site, isn’t it? At the very least, I very often saw these Part 1, Part 2 ...
Yes, when they are part of the official name.
https://www.tvmaze.com/faq/15/episodes
Suffixes that are not part of the original episode title are strictly forbidden. Examples of that are "(Part 1)", "(Pilot)" or "(a.k.a. Previous Working Title)".
In any case, the full names of the three episodes I have provided you. Act in accordance with your policy or as you want. I will not change anything.
I already did. Since the on-screen title is barely usable, the next best source (per policy) would be the official episode guide.
@JuanArango wrote:
The Policy says that on-screen tops everything, so we should act accordingly to this :)
and name all episodes exactly the same? nice.
@tnt wrote:
and name all episodes exactly the same? nice.
no no, we add the part 1, part 2 to it of course :)
You can even without "part 1", but simply after each name (1), (2), (3).
@Nikquest wrote:
You can even without "part 1", but simply after each name (1), (2), (3).
go ahead :)
@JuanArango wrote:
go ahead :)
According to what, may I ask? Policy explicitly forbids that.
Episodes already have official names, with official part numbering etc. Could you explain to me, why we need to use made up suffixes, and which part of the policy allow this?
@tnt wrote:
According to what, may I ask? Policy explicitly forbids that.
we have to find a middle way here and I think using the onscreen plus marking it with part 1, part 2 is the most logical thing to do :)
it seems there are several official names, then the policy states that on-screen tops all, but this is such a minor issue, I do not mind either way, just do not want an edit war :)
Please can Ray Lee have the L on his last name capitalised? Thanks :)
@TomSouthwell wrote:
Please can Ray Lee have the L on his last name capitalised? Thanks :)
done :)
@Jan wrote:
Edit Requests can be posted here.
Note: the old thread was closed down due to its size.
In the Law and Order : Special Victims Unit , Season 21 Episode 13 story "Redemption In Her Corner" , the actor Daniel Zacapa is credited as playing a character called "Luis Nunez" . This is incorrect, the character's name is "Santos Morales" Zacapa did play a character called "Luis Nunez" in the Season 16 episode called "Padre Sandunguero"
@Steve1264 wrote:
In the Law and Order : Special Victims Unit , Season 21 Episode 13 story "Redemption In Her Corner" , the actor Daniel Zacapa is credited as playing a character called "Luis Nunez" . This is incorrect, the character's name is "Santos Morales" Zacapa did play a character called "Luis Nunez" in the Season 16 episode called "Padre Sandunguero"
thank you, it is fixed :)
@JuanArango wrote:
we have to find a middle way here and I think using the onscreen plus marking it with part 1, part 2 is the most logical thing to do :)
No. The most logical thing to do is to use that official source which offers a unique name for each episode.
it seems there are several official names, then the policy states that on-screen tops all, but this is such a minor issue, I do not mind either way, just do not want an edit war :)
On-screen card does not includes any "part 1" or (1) suffixes, and doesn't make any other distinction between episodes. Adding such prefixes manually is explicitly forbidden by policy. Therefore on-screen names in this case are not usable, so the next logical step would be to look at the next best source. Which would be either futon http://www.thefutoncritic.com/showatch/50-states-of-fright/listings/, or the listing in Quibi app (see the screenshot above).
@tnt wrote:
No. The most logical thing to do is to use that official source which offers a unique name for each episode.On-screen card does not includes any "part 1" or (1) suffixes, or any other distinction between episodes. Adding such prefixes manually is explicitely forbidden by policy. Therefore on-screen names in this case are not appropriate, so we could look at the next best source. Which would be either futon http://www.thefutoncritic.com/showatch/50-states-of-fright/listings/, or the listing in Quibi app (see the screenshot above).
I am fine with either way :)
@JuanArango wrote:
I am fine with either way :)
As a head contributor you shouldn't be fine with going against the policy or encouraging users to violate it :P
@tnt wrote:
Yes, when they are part of the official name.
https://www.tvmaze.com/faq/15/episodes
Suffixes that are not part of the original episode title are strictly forbidden. Examples of that are "(Part 1)", "(Pilot)" or "(a.k.a. Previous Working Title)".I already did. Since the on-screen title is barely usable, the next best source (per policy) would be the official episode guide.
Not true sir, it's press release ahead of episode guides :)
@Thomas wrote:
Not true sir, it's press release ahead of episode guides :)
Yes, in general, if you could find one. In this particular case there's no episodic press releases for this show, so the next best source is episode guide.
Whew! Almost done, but I also need Melody Perkins as Karone removed from episodes The Rangers' Mega Voyage (2) and Red with Envy.
@SteveZilla wrote:
Whew! Almost done, but I need Melody Perkins as Karone removed from episodes The Rangers' Mega Voyage (2) and Red with Envy.
done :)
